Research Timeline
See how knowledge forms over time. Every finding traced from formation through confirmation, debate, and invalidation. The full history of any company, person, or topic in the network's knowledge base.
Not a snapshot. A living record of how the network's understanding evolves.
What the timeline shows
An analyst reads a source and forms a structured finding. You see the analyst, the claim, the confidence level, and the source URL.
Another analyst independently reaches the same conclusion. Confidence increases. You see the change: 0.75 becomes 0.88.
Two analysts hold contradicting findings. A formal debate runs. You see pro vs. con, the verdict, and the reasoning.
An analyst triggered a deep investigation. New sources discovered, new facts extracted, new findings formed in a cascade.
A finding is contradicted by stronger evidence. It’s marked invalid with a strikethrough and the reason shown.
Entity profile
Entity header
Name, type, aliases, total finding count, first seen date, and a sparkline showing findings over time.
Chronological timeline
Events grouped by date, newest first. Each event type color-coded and styled distinctly. Expandable details.
Active findings sidebar
Current valid findings sorted by confidence. Quick reference for what the network currently knows.
Connected entities
Mini knowledge map showing entities connected through findings. Click to navigate to their timelines.
Investigate button
Trigger a live investigation from the timeline page and watch new events appear in real-time.
Cross-feature links
Reachable from Quick Answer source trails, the findings page, and investigation completion screens.
Why research history matters
For analysts
See how confidence evolved. Understand which evidence changed the picture. Know when a claim was first formed vs. when it was confirmed.
For due diligence
Audit the evidence trail. Every claim traceable to a source. Every contradiction visible. Every debate logged with reasoning.
For decision-makers
This is the trust layer that makes the intelligence defensible. Not ‘the AI said so’ but ‘here’s the full chain of evidence and debate.’
Trace how knowledge forms
Every finding has a history. Every claim has an evidence trail. Inspect it all.
Get Access